Jennifer Lopez is struggling to keep individual video footage the girl once experienced with her first partner, Ojani Noa, from seeing the light of day. It — which consists of 27 hours of photos — allegedly includes sex situations from the pair’s honeymoon vacation back in 1997. Noa attempted to sell the tape, which has sparked the best battle with the sexy singer.

But the 41-year-old singer surely could get a courtroom order barring Noa out of releasing the tape, in least for a day. In Monday, Oregon Region Superior Court Judge Adam Chalfant ruled in her favor and issued a brief restraining buy stopping the distribution of this film. However , the assess declined to end media outlets from bandying the racy footage in the event that they get lucky and get their hands on that.

Noa’s lawyer, Drew Meyer, can be arguing that his consumer didn’t disobey any privacy agreements with Lopez when he started store shopping the project around. States that the video clip is not really a sex strapping and says he’s just producing a mockumentary regarding the couple’s tumultuous romantic relationship.

Although Noa was unable to launch the movie, he still desires to do so. He reportedly feels that the cassette is safe to release now that Lopez provides withdrawn her claim against him while the case was in arbitration. Regarding to In Touch magazine, the master tape in the footage is currently in a central depository nevertheless Meyer states that they have determined a legal loophole and will be able to release this soon.

J Lo’s ex-husband had been caught together with his hand in the cookie container once before, and the “I Can’t Believe that It” performer isn’t acquiring any chances this time around. She lately sued Noa https://married-dating.org/cheatinghousewife-review/ with respect to $10 mil claiming that he breached a confidentiality agreement if he attempted to sell the home video video footage from their marital relationship, which just lasted eleven months.

Noa has recently filed his own court action against the hot star, claiming that the woman wrongfully dismissed him by her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He also attempted to write a tell-all about their marital life and was blocked by simply Lopez’s solicitors. In that past round of litigation, Noa was purchased to give the singer money and decided not to show you for money any seductive details about their particular relationship.